Biofield Tuning Research
3 peer-reviewed studies supporting this intervention. Evidence rating: C
Study Comparison
| Study | Year | Type | Journal | Key Finding |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bartel L et al. | 2021 | Study | Healthcare | Narrative review mapping mechanisms by which low-frequency sound vibration (up to 250 Hz) affects human health through hemodynamic, neurological, and musculoskeletal pathways. |
| Jain S et al. | 2015 | Review | Global Advances in Health and Medicine | Comprehensive review of biofield science noting emerging evidence for biofield therapies while calling for rigorous research methodologies. |
| Jain S et al. | 2015 | Review | Global Advances in Health and Medicine | Systematic review found moderate evidence that biofield therapies reduce pain, with strongest effects in clinical populations. |
Study Details
Healthcare
View Summary
This narrative review maps the landscape of mechanisms by which sound vibration affects human health, focusing on low frequency sound (up to 250 Hz) including infrasound (1-16 Hz).
Types of application covered include whole body vibration, vibroacoustics, and focal vibration applications. The review categorizes response mechanisms into hemodynamic, neurological, and musculoskeletal effects.
Global Advances in Health and Medicine
View Summary
This transdisciplinary review examines the scientific basis for biofield therapies and healing practices.
While acknowledging methodological challenges, the review documents preliminary evidence for biofield effects on physiology and healing, supporting continued research.
Global Advances in Health and Medicine
View Summary
This systematic review examined controlled trials of biofield therapies (including sound and energy-based approaches) for pain conditions.
Analysis found moderate evidence for pain reduction, particularly in clinical populations, though methodological limitations were noted across studies.
Evidence Assessment
This intervention has preliminary evidence from early-stage research, mechanistic studies, or observational data. More rigorous trials are needed.