Biofield Tuning Research

2 peer-reviewed studies supporting this intervention. Evidence rating: C

2 Studies
0 RCTs
0 Meta-analyses
2015 Year Range

Study Comparison

Study Year Type Journal Key Finding
Jain S et al. 2015 Review Global Advances in Health and Medicine Comprehensive review of biofield science noting emerging evidence for biofield therapies while calling for rigorous research methodologies.
Jain S et al. 2015 Review Global Advances in Health and Medicine Systematic review found moderate evidence that biofield therapies reduce pain, with strongest effects in clinical populations.

Study Details

Jain S, Ives J, Jonas W, Hammerschlag R, Muehsam D, Vieten C, et al

Global Advances in Health and Medicine

Key Finding: Comprehensive review of biofield science noting emerging evidence for biofield therapies while calling for rigorous research methodologies.
View Summary

This transdisciplinary review examines the scientific basis for biofield therapies and healing practices.

While acknowledging methodological challenges, the review documents preliminary evidence for biofield effects on physiology and healing, supporting continued research.

Jain S, Hammerschlag R, Mills P, et al

Global Advances in Health and Medicine

Key Finding: Systematic review found moderate evidence that biofield therapies reduce pain, with strongest effects in clinical populations.
View Summary

This systematic review examined controlled trials of biofield therapies (including sound and energy-based approaches) for pain conditions.

Analysis found moderate evidence for pain reduction, particularly in clinical populations, though methodological limitations were noted across studies.

Evidence Assessment

C Limited Evidence

This intervention has preliminary evidence from early-stage research, mechanistic studies, or observational data. More rigorous trials are needed.