Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation improves pain intensity, disability and quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

García-López H, Calle-Ortega F, García-Robles P, et al. (2024) Disability and rehabilitation
Title and abstract of Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation improves pain intensity, disability and quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Key Takeaway

TENS significantly reduces pain intensity, disability, and improves quality of life in fibromyalgia patients compared to control interventions.

Summary

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for treating fibromyalgia syndrome, a chronic condition characterized by widespread pain, fatigue, and reduced quality of life.

The researchers analyzed randomized controlled trials comparing TENS to sham or other interventions in fibromyalgia patients. The meta-analysis found that TENS produced statistically significant improvements in pain intensity, functional disability, and overall quality of life measures.

These findings support TENS as a non-pharmacological treatment option for fibromyalgia, offering benefits without the side effects associated with medications commonly prescribed for this condition.

Methods

  • Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines
  • Searched multiple databases for randomized controlled trials
  • Included studies comparing TENS to sham TENS or other control interventions
  • Outcomes assessed: pain intensity, disability, quality of life
  • Meta-analysis conducted using standardized mean differences
  • Risk of bias assessed using Cochrane tools

Key Results

  • TENS significantly reduced pain intensity compared to control groups
  • Significant improvements in disability scores
  • Quality of life measures improved with TENS treatment
  • Effects observed across multiple assessment timepoints
  • Low to moderate heterogeneity across included studies

Limitations

  • Varying TENS protocols across studies (frequency, intensity, duration)
  • Relatively small sample sizes in some included trials
  • Short follow-up periods in most studies
  • Potential for blinding issues with sham TENS comparisons
  • Limited data on long-term effectiveness

Related Interventions

Related Studies

Source

View on PubMed →

DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2331069