The Buteyko breathing technique in children with asthma: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Vagedes J, Helmert E, Kuderer S, et al. (2021) Complementary therapies in medicine
Title and abstract of The Buteyko breathing technique in children with asthma: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Key Takeaway

Buteyko breathing training improved lung function (FEV1) at rest and after exercise in children with asthma, though it did not reduce medication use over 3 months.

Summary

This randomized controlled pilot study was the first to evaluate Buteyko breathing technique specifically in children with asthma. Thirty-two children aged 6-15 with partially controlled asthma were randomized to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU plus an intensive 5-day Buteyko training followed by 3 months of home practice.

While the primary outcome of bronchodilator reduction showed no significant between-group difference, the Buteyko group demonstrated significantly improved lung function (FEV1) both at rest and after exercise. Parents also reported significantly improved emotional function on quality-of-life measures. The study suggests Buteyko may have distinct benefits in pediatric populations, potentially improving airway function rather than just reducing medication dependence as seen in adult studies.

Methods

  • 32 children aged 6-15 with partially controlled asthma
  • 66% male participants
  • Randomized to treatment as usual (TAU) or TAU plus Buteyko
  • Buteyko group: intensive 5-day training followed by 3 months home practice
  • Primary outcome: bronchodilator reduction
  • Secondary outcomes: FEV1 at rest and after exercise, quality of life, corticosteroid use
  • 3-month follow-up period

Key Results

  • No significant between-group difference in bronchodilator reduction (primary outcome)
  • Significantly improved FEV1 at rest in Buteyko group (P=0.04)
  • Significantly improved FEV1 after exercise in Buteyko group (P=0.02)
  • Significantly improved parental emotional function on quality-of-life measure (P<0.01)
  • No significant differences in corticosteroid reduction or other parameters

Limitations

  • Pilot study with small sample size (n=32)
  • Short follow-up period (3 months)
  • Cannot blind a behavioral intervention
  • Pediatric population limits generalizability to adults
  • Home practice adherence not objectively verified

Related Interventions

Related Studies

More by Vagedes

Source

View on PubMed →

DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102582