Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients

Wisløff U, Støylen A, Loennechen JP, Bruvold M, Rognmo Ø, Haram PM, Tjønna AE, Helgerud J, Slørdahl SA, Lee SJ, Videm V, Bye A, Smith GL, Najjar SM, Ellingsen Ø, Skjaerpe T (2007) Circulation

Key Takeaway

The 4x4 Norwegian interval protocol improved VO2max by 46% in heart failure patients, vastly outperforming moderate continuous training.

Summary

This landmark study established the 4x4 Norwegian protocol as the gold standard for VO2max improvement. Heart failure patients were randomized to either 4x4 intervals (4 min at 90-95% max HR, 3 min recovery) or moderate continuous training.

The interval group improved VO2max by 46% compared to 14% in the moderate group. The intervals also reversed cardiac remodeling and improved quality of life more than continuous training.

This study launched widespread adoption of the 4x4 protocol and demonstrated that high-intensity intervals are safe and effective even in cardiac patients.

Methods

  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Heart failure patients (EF <40%)
  • 12 weeks of training, 3x/week
  • 4x4 intervals vs moderate continuous

Key Results

  • VO2max: +46% (intervals) vs +14% (moderate)
  • Reversed left ventricular remodeling
  • Improved endothelial function
  • Better quality of life scores

Limitations

  • Heart failure population, not healthy adults
  • Supervised training environment
  • 12-week duration

Related Interventions

Source

View on PubMed →

DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.675041