Progressive muscle relaxation exercises in patients with COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Seid AA, Mohammed AA, Hasen AA (2023) Medicine
Title and abstract of Progressive muscle relaxation exercises in patients with COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Key Takeaway

PMR significantly improved sleep quality (SMD -1.43) and reduced anxiety (SMD -2.56) in COVID-19 patients across 9 studies with 626 participants.

Summary

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) exercises on sleep quality, anxiety, and depression in patients with COVID-19. The authors searched major databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus for randomized controlled trials examining PMR in COVID-19 patients.

Nine RCTs with a total of 626 participants were included. The meta-analysis found that PMR significantly improved sleep quality (SMD -1.43, 95% CI: -2.37 to -0.49) and reduced anxiety levels (SMD -2.56, 95% CI: -4.21 to -0.91) compared to control groups. However, the effect on depression did not reach statistical significance.

The findings suggest that PMR is a safe, accessible, and effective non-pharmacological intervention for managing the psychological burden of COVID-19, particularly for sleep disturbances and anxiety. The authors recommend integrating PMR into standard care protocols for hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Methods

Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs following PRISMA guidelines. Searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. Included 9 RCTs with 626 COVID-19 patients. Quality assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Effect sizes calculated as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals using random-effects models.

Key Results

PMR significantly improved sleep quality (SMD -1.43, 95% CI: -2.37 to -0.49, p = 0.003) and reduced anxiety (SMD -2.56, 95% CI: -4.21 to -0.91, p = 0.002). The effect on depression was not statistically significant. Substantial heterogeneity was observed across studies (I-squared > 75% for most outcomes).

Figures

Limitations

High heterogeneity across included studies. Relatively small total sample size (626 participants). Most studies were conducted in China, limiting generalizability. Variation in PMR protocols (duration, frequency, follow-up periods) across studies. Risk of bias concerns in some included trials due to lack of blinding.

Related Interventions

Related Studies

Source

View on PubMed →

DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033464