Does objectively measured prolonged standing for desk work result in lower ratings of perceived low back pain than sitting? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

De Carvalho D, Greene R, Swab M, et al. (2021) Work (Reading, Mass.)
Title and abstract of Does objectively measured prolonged standing for desk work result in lower ratings of perceived low back pain than sitting? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Key Takeaway

Prolonged standing at a desk does not reduce low back pain compared to sitting; alternating between sitting and standing is more beneficial than sustained standing alone.

Summary

This meta-analysis examined whether standing desks reduce perceived low back pain compared to sitting. The authors focused on studies with objective standing time measurement.

The pooled analysis found no significant difference in low back pain between prolonged standing and prolonged sitting. Sustained standing could increase discomfort in some individuals.

The key appears to be alternating postures regularly throughout the day, supporting sit-stand desks for posture variation rather than as a replacement for sitting.

Methods

  • Systematic review with meta-analysis
  • Objective standing time measurement required
  • Standardized low back pain outcome measures
  • Risk of bias assessment

Key Results

  • No significant difference in low back pain between standing and sitting
  • Prolonged standing can increase discomfort
  • Posture alternation more beneficial than sustained standing
  • Effect sizes small and inconsistent

Limitations

  • Limited number of high-quality studies
  • Heterogeneity in pain measurement tools
  • Short duration of most interventions

Related Interventions

Related Studies

Source

View on PubMed →

DOI: 10.3233/WOR-203292