The efficacy of using continuous glucose monitoring as a behaviour change tool in populations with and without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Richardson KM, Jospe MR, Bohlen LC, et al. (2024) The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
cgm
Title and abstract of The efficacy of using continuous glucose monitoring as a behaviour change tool in populations with and without diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Key Takeaway

CGM used as a behaviour change tool significantly improves HbA1c and body weight in both diabetic and non-diabetic populations compared to controls, supporting its role beyond traditional diabetes management.

Summary

This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluated the effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring as a behavioral change intervention across populations with and without diabetes. The authors identified RCTs where CGM was used specifically as a tool to drive lifestyle modifications rather than purely for clinical glucose management.

The meta-analysis found that CGM-based interventions led to statistically significant reductions in HbA1c compared to control groups, with meaningful effects observed in both diabetic and non-diabetic populations. Additionally, CGM users achieved greater reductions in body weight, suggesting that the real-time biofeedback from CGM motivated sustained dietary and physical activity changes.

Importantly, the study demonstrated that CGM value extends well beyond its traditional use in diabetes management. When framed as a behaviour change tool, CGM provides the kind of immediate, personalized feedback that supports self-regulation and goal-directed health behaviours. The authors concluded that CGM represents a promising intervention for improving metabolic health outcomes across a broad population, though they called for more research on long-term adherence and cost-effectiveness.

Figures

Related Interventions

Related Studies

Source

View on PubMed →

DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01692-6