The Art of Manliness

Born to Carry — How to Build Strength, Stamina, and Sanity Through Rucking

The Art of Manliness with Michael Easter 2026-02-24

Summary

Michael Easter, author of Walk with Weight, joins Brett McKay to explore the evolutionary and scientific case for rucking. Easter argues that humans are uniquely built to carry weight over distance — a trait that predates our ability to run — and that this deeply human activity offers remarkable fitness benefits including fat loss, bone density improvements, back pain relief, and cardiovascular health. The conversation traces carrying from hunter-gatherer survival through military history to today's civilian fitness movement. The episode covers practical guidance for getting started with rucking, including weight recommendations (starting at 10% of body weight), the backpack-vs-vest debate, and how to integrate rucking into daily life. Easter introduces his "2% mindset" — the idea that choosing small discomforts like carrying weight during everyday activities compounds into significant health gains over time. The discussion also addresses safety concerns, noting that civilian rucking with moderate loads has an injury rate close to walking's 1%.

Key Points

  • Humans are the only mammals that can carry weight for long distances, making carrying a foundational human activity that predates organized militaries by millions of years
  • Rucking burns 20-200% more calories than walking or running alone, and research on backcountry hunters showed 12 pounds of pure fat loss with zero muscle loss
  • The gravitostat hypothesis suggests bones sense body weight and signal metabolism accordingly, meaning a weighted vest may prevent metabolic slowdown during weight loss
  • Military research found one-third of body weight is the upper limit for safe load carriage; civilians should stay well below this for health-focused rucking
  • Rucking strengthens the core more than the back muscles, which is why it can actually relieve back pain — a condition affecting 80% of people at some point
  • A backpack is generally superior to a weighted vest for most people due to better breathing, temperature regulation, and the ability to lean into the load for comfort
  • Start with 10% of body weight in any backpack, keep the weight high and tight against your back, and simply do your normal walking route
  • The "2% mindset" means choosing short-term discomfort for long-term benefit — like throwing on a ruck while walking the dog or doing chores

Key Moments

Rucking

Humans are born to carry, not just born to run

Michael Easter explains that while humans evolved to run for hunting, what got lost is that after killing an animal 10 miles from camp, you had to carry it back — and we are the only animal that can pick up weight and carry it a long distance across the earth.

"We don't overheat when it's hot out and we're running, so we would use that to our advantage. We'd run like 10 miles chasing an animal. Eventually, it would get too hot. It would topple over. We would spear it or whatever, and then we would successfully complete this hunt. Now, what got lost in that, though, and this is kind of the realization that I had when I was hunting up in the Arctic, is what happens after you have killed the animal and you're 10 miles from camp. You got to carry that thing back, right? And if you look at us compared to many other animals, pretty much every animal can run, but we're the only animal that can pick up weight and carry it a long distance across the earth. And that was only in the context of hunting, right? If you look at what humans sort of evolved doing every single day, we were carrying all the time. We were hunters and gatherers. And gathering is simply an act of walking around, finding food."
Rucking

Rucking uniquely preserves muscle during fat loss

Research on backcountry hunters showed that carrying heavy packs while undereating caused 12 pounds of pure fat loss with zero muscle loss, suggesting rucking signals the body to preserve muscle while preferentially burning fat.

"You're also not packing in a ton of food because food is heavy. So, you're generally undereating, which sort of simulates the exact same thing that people do when they're trying to lose weight. You want to move more, you want to eat less. Now, when most people lose weight, you lose a mix of fat, yes, but also muscle. So, you want to lose the fat, but you ideally want to hang on to as much muscle as possible because muscle is going to be good for your ability to function. It's going to be better for your metabolism, on and on and on. But when these guys came back from their hunt and they retested them, these researchers found that the hunters lost, I think it was about 12 pounds on average. And the entirety of that loss came from fat, which is really surprising. So, they hadn't lost any muscle, And in fact, they had gained a slight amount. It was insignificant, but it was still a slight amount, which really shows us rocking can be great for fat loss. And I think the reason for that is rather simple. It's that when you have this load on your body, your body needs to hang on to your muscle in order to move that load across the ground."
Rucking

Weight on your back actually strengthens your core, not your back

Easter explains the counterintuitive finding that carrying weight on your back makes your back muscles work less while your core picks up the slack, which is why rucking can actually relieve back pain in 80% of people who experience it.

"When you have the weight on your back, you would think your back starts to work much harder. That's not actually the case. Your back muscles end up working less when you have a weight on your back. And so then the question is: okay, well, what's keeping me upright?"
Rucking

Rucking as the great social equalizer

Easter describes how rucking solves the fitness mismatch problem — two people of different fitness levels can ruck together by simply carrying different weights, enabling deep conversation while both get an equally challenging workout.

"you can simply carry, say, 45 pounds and get a great workout and walk. And I can just carry, say, 30 pounds and I can get an equally good workout and we can have that walk, go rucking together and have a long conversation and really connect."
Rucking

The 2% mindset applied to rucking

Easter explains the origin of the 2% mindset — only 2% of people take the stairs when an escalator is available — and how rucking fits into this philosophy of embracing short-term discomfort for long-term health benefits throughout everyday life.

"What is the 2% mindset and how do you apply it to rocking? Yeah, so the 2% mindset comes from this study that found that only 2% of people take the stairs there's also an escalator available."

Related Research

Relationship of Daily Step Counts to All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Events. Stens NA (2023) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology Meta-analysis of 111,309 adults found mortality benefits starting at just 2,517 steps/day, with optimal doses around 8,763 steps for mortality and 7,126 steps for CVD, and additional benefits from higher stepping cadence.
Daily Step Count and All-Cause Mortality: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Jayedi A (2022) · Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) Walking 7,000-10,000 steps per day is associated with a 50-70% lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to walking fewer than 4,000 steps, with the steepest benefits occurring between 3,000 and 7,000 steps.
Daily steps and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of 15 international cohorts Paluch AE (2022) · The Lancet Public Health Meta-analysis of 47,000+ adults showing that more daily steps are associated with progressively lower mortality risk, with benefits plateauing around 8,000-10,000 steps for older adults.
The relationships between step count and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events: A dose-response meta-analysis. Sheng M (2022) · Journal of sport and health science Each additional 1,000 daily steps reduces all-cause mortality risk by 12% and cardiovascular event risk by 5%, with benefits plateauing around 8,000-10,000 steps per day.
Prospective Associations of Daily Step Counts and Intensity With Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Incidence and Mortality and All-Cause Mortality. Del Pozo Cruz B (2022) · JAMA internal medicine UK Biobank study of 78,500 adults found that 10,000 steps/day was associated with 53% lower all-cause mortality, 65% lower cancer mortality, and 73% lower cardiovascular mortality compared to 2,000 steps/day.
Daily steps and health outcomes in adults: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Ding D (2025) · The Lancet. Public health A comprehensive Lancet meta-analysis confirms that higher daily step counts are associated with significantly lower risks of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and type 2 diabetes, with most benefits accruing by 8,000-10,000 steps per day.
The association between daily step count and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a meta-analysis. Banach M (2023) · European journal of preventive cardiology Largest meta-analysis on steps and mortality (226,889 participants) found every 1,000-step increase reduces all-cause mortality by 15%, with benefits starting at just 2,337 steps/day for cardiovascular mortality.
Association of daily step count and intensity with incident dementia del Pozo Cruz B (2022) · JAMA Neurology Walking ~10,000 steps daily was associated with 51% lower dementia risk, with benefits starting at just 3,800 steps per day.

Related Interventions

In Playlists

Featured Experts